[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Perceived C/B for XML 1.1


xml 1.1 browser
> Eric van der Vlist scripsit:
> 
> > But then, they'll have derogated from being conservative in what they
> > send...

I guess the Ethopians want to be conservative: to use an international standard
(Unicode 3.2) rather than some homemade encodings!

I think there is middle approach between John Cowan's "It is a question of justice"
approach and Michael Kay's "This is of marginal value compared to the costs" which
I certainly understand. That is for XML 1.1 to be undistruptive and slow enough 
that it can infiltrate slowly: I have followed XML 1.1 very closely, and I think it
is now undisruptive (and, in the single area that it disrupts, it is an improvement)
and can be introduced slowly.

There is no XML 2.0 project in the works: I guess the fastest one could happen
would be 2 years minimum.  So this clears up one area of value to some.

Cheers
Rick Jelliffe

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
 

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.


Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.