[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Do We Need James Clark to get Good Recs?
Sometimes it seems to me that most of the XML-related Recs/Specs that xml-dev'ers approve of are those that James Clark had a major influence on. Sax is an exception, I suppose, but that had David M. playing a unifying role, so maybe it is in a similar category. I would like to ask a few questions about this. 1) Is this perception widely shared on the list? 2) If so, is it specifically James, or is it the mode of development? 3) Are there any examples of good/elegant/approved (by xml-dev'ers) recs that were developed in a different way? 4) If there is a mode of development that tends to lead to especially good/elegant/etc recs, can we foster that mode? Or does it take specific individuals with very special knowledge and personal qualities? Cheers, Tom P
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|