[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: <!-- -- -->
On Tue, 2002-10-08 at 16:07, John Cowan wrote: > Exactly. "For compatibility" statements are "must" statements. > "For interoperability" statements, OTOH, are only "should"s. Except for W3C XML Schema which says: [Definition:] for compatibility A feature of this specification included solely to ensure that schemas which use this feature remain compatible with [XML 1.0 (Second Edition)] and means "may if you want to really look old fashioned" :-) But W3C XML Schema is a different world by itself! Eric -- Freelance consulting and training. http://dyomedea.com/english/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Eric van der Vlist http://xmlfr.org http://dyomedea.com (W3C) XML Schema ISBN:0-596-00252-1 http://oreilly.com/catalog/xmlschema ------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|