[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: We need SAX features to say a parser supports XML
At 10:14 AM -0400 10/25/02, John Cowan wrote: >Read the errata page. Oh joy. Another erratum that rewrites history because the working group changed its mind. Sorry. I don't accept such errata as normative. The spec is clear an unambiguous. There is no plausible argument that the original spec made a mistake. The people who wrote the spec knew what they were writing and why they were writing it. Now, retroactively, somebody's decided they were wrong, and they're going to fix it. Sorry. This can't be done in an erratum. XML 1.0 says what it says. Parsers are designed around it. If you're going to change the BNF grammar, then you've invented a new language. XML 1.0 plus errata is no longer XML 1.0. It is provably true that <?xml version="1.1"?><root /> is a well-formed XML 1.0 document. -- +-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+ | Elliotte Rusty Harold | elharo@m... | Writer/Programmer | +-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+ | XML in a Nutshell, 2nd Edition (O'Reilly, 2002) | | http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/xian2/ | | http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN%3D0596002920/cafeaulaitA/ | +----------------------------------+---------------------------------+ | Read Cafe au Lait for Java News: http://www.cafeaulait.org/ | | Read Cafe con Leche for XML News: http://www.cafeconleche.org/ | +----------------------------------+---------------------------------+
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|