[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Which is better (for medical data)?

• To: "Elizabeth Hinson" <elhinson@r...>, <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Which is better (for medical data)?
• From: "Ken North" <ken_north@c...>
• Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 14:50:16 -0700
• Sender: ken_north@c...

> If your data is  mission-critical, then it represents a health and safety
issue or a
> "bet-your- business" proposition if it is lost or corrupted.

This article discusses mission-critical databases and security/privacy
requirements:
http://www.newarchitectmag.com/documents/s=5732/new1013637590/index.html

If you search with Google, you'll find 2200+ articles about "mission-critical
database". Some are about XML-enabled products such as Oracle, DB2 and SQL
Server. Others are about native XML products such as Tamino.

• Prev by Date: Re: Which is better (for medical data)?
• Next by Date: Java package for XPath 1.0
• Previous by thread: RE: Which is better (for medical data)?
• Next by thread: Re: SVG and embedded images?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread