[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Future of XSL-FO at W3C??
Ian Tindale scripsit: > Not convinced. In fact, using your examples, you're in danger of presenting > possibly out of date possibly distributed possibly restored from backup etc. > versions rather than to regenerate the freshest one and only. [strokes chin, > makes tea, wondering if I'm actually right - nah - nobody ever does that with > PostScript unless they're mad or talk to themselves.]. Au contraire. People *do* keep around Postscript all the time -- when you download a technical paper, the chance that it is in Postscript or PDF is pretty close to 100%, unless it comes from the W3C or some such place that has an ax to grind. In any case, people don't always *want* the latest version. Sometimes they want the version that was published (i.e. distributed to the public, not necessarily printed) on January 12, 1999, with not a jot changed. -- John Cowan jcowan@r... "You need a change: try Canada" "You need a change: try China" --fortune cookies opened by a couple that I know
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|