[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns

• To: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Subject: Re: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
• From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>
• Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2002 11:20:04 -0400
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• References: <72RLYT04POLJXV95A7FBMJXRM82TRVT.3d9a6f4c@MChamp> <144498584266.20021002103555@j...> <3D9B0101.4020504@t...> <3D9B0CB4.6010207@p...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0rc2) Gecko/20020510

>  I think the proportion of
> cases where XMLSchema validation happens at application run-time is 
> going to be way short of 100%.  I personally think's actually going to 
> be way short of 25%, it's useful for design support and debugging but 
> it's just not at the right level for business-logic validation.

I'm not so sure.  Particularly when the XML messages span administrative 
domains, schema validation seems like a good way to help protect your 
application against stupid and/or malicious programmers.  In fact, we 
believe it should be pushed all the way down to the network layer. :)
	/r$

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
    • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>

• References:
  • Re: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
    • From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
  • Re: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
    • From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@j...>
  • Re: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
  • Re: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
• Next by Date: Re: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
• Previous by thread: Re: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
• Next by thread: Re: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread