[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
Eric van der Vlist [mailto:vdv@d...] wrote: > By business logic, I guess that Tim meant (or I least I would say > myself) that W3C XML Schema is often weak and requires at least the > addition of a rule based schema language like Schematron if not the > full flexibility and power of XSLT or a general purpose programming > language... Ok, that makes more sense. Having additional rule/constraint evaluation built into the language is a huge plus, but it can always be layered over schema validation. In .NET, you can accomplish this by writing a custom extension that can be used declaratively on your WS methods. -- Aaron Skonnard <http://skonnard.com>, DevelopMentor <http://develop.com> Essential XML Quick Reference available online in PDF format... <http://develop.com/books> Before you criticize someone, you should walk a mile in their shoes. That way, when you criticize them, you're a mile away and you have their shoes.
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|