[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Rethinking namespaces, attribute remapping (was Re: [xml-d
Simple question: Does HLink fit into the rest of the XML architecture that is currently being built by the W3C? My personal opinion is that it doesn't and shouldn't although I agree that the HTML working group needs something like this for their unique use case. It's quite interesting to note that although HTML brought the W3C to prominence and XML even more so, the descendants of HTML do not fit in the current vision and body of work the W3C is going forward with. -----Original Message----- From: Simon St.Laurent [mailto:simonstl@s...] Sent: Fri 9/27/2002 10:35 AM To: xml-dev@l... Cc: Subject: Re: Rethinking namespaces, attribute remapping (was Re: TAG on HLink) I'm still waiting for an open explanation of how we got into this mess in the first place, and why the TAG so unanimously opted to reject HLink. We're missing a lot of context that would help clear technical discussion, so don't be surprised that you're getting a lot of emotions. ------------- Simon St.Laurent - SSL is my TLA http://simonstl.com may be my URI http://monasticxml.org may be my ascetic URI urn:oid:1.3.6.1.4.1.6320 is another possibility altogether ----------------------------------------------------------------- The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|