[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: parser models
At 5:49 PM -0400 9/23/02, Simon St.Laurent wrote: >I take it you mean "complete XML documents" as opposed to "XML documents >in the often messy process of creation". > >That's another aspect of XML processing that's been sadly neglected. > That seems to me to fall into the same territory as caring about the difference between character and entity references and CDATA sections: it's relevant to one style of editors. It's really pretty pointless for everything else. SAX, DOM, JDOM, XOM, etc. just aren't really up to the needs of an source code based XML editor, but that's OK. Source-obvious XML editors (i.e. programs like XML Spy that expose the XML to the author but not programs like OpenOffice that don't show the XML to the end user) are a use case with lots of strange requirements that just aren't present in any other use case. Adding the features necessary for editors would immensely complexify an API for other, more common use cases. Editors justifiably need a different API. -- +-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+ | Elliotte Rusty Harold | elharo@m... | Writer/Programmer | +-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+ | XML in a Nutshell, 2nd Edition (O'Reilly, 2002) | | http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/xian2/ | | http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN%3D0596002920/cafeaulaitA/ | +----------------------------------+---------------------------------+ | Read Cafe au Lait for Java News: http://www.cafeaulait.org/ | | Read Cafe con Leche for XML News: http://www.cafeconleche.org/ | +----------------------------------+---------------------------------+
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|