[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: RE: Rethinking namespaces,attribute remapping (was Re: [x
9/27/2002 2:20:10 PM, Mike Champion <mc@x...> wrote: > > >This is, admittedly a REAL simple use case (they only look for >a small number of tags in a very flat XML hierarchy) but seems >to at least minimally prove the concept that well-formed XML >is more than a "non-starter." Getting those folks to agree >on a common schema is EMPRICALLY a non-starter :-) BTW, I REALLY REALLY hope that Len's customers in Public Safety agencies get along better than the RSS folks <duck>. I'm not disputing that authoritative schema are best *if* they can be agreed upon and enforced, just arguing that "tag soup" beats non-"self-describing" alternatives such as CSV if they can't.
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|