[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Underwhelmed (WAS: XOM micro tutorial)
Mike Champion scripsit: > [...] non-namespaced well-formed XML [...] I hasten to mention that XOM works fine with non-namespaced XML; it just doesn't have a Level 1 interface that *only* works for non-namespaced XML. > I also appreciated the point that John Cowan made about XOM's > conceptual integrity. As we all know, W3C DOM got the way it is > partly because it is the proverbial camel designed by a committee. Worse, because it also had to be at least somewhat compatible with the old browser DOMs, which were by no means compatible with each other. As you know. > [L]et a hundred > refactorizations of DOM/JDOM/dom4j/proprietary APIs bloom, > create an ecology of competing codes, and let Father Darwin sort > them out. Hear, hear! -- There is / One art John Cowan <jcowan@r...> No more / No less http://www.reutershealth.com To do / All things http://www.ccil.org/~cowan With art- / Lessness -- Piet Hein
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|