[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Rethinking namespaces, attribute remapping

• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Rethinking namespaces, attribute remapping
• From: Norman Walsh <ndw@n...>
• Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 12:33:53 -0400
• In-reply-to: <1033398572.2278.470.camel@ibook> (Eric van der Vlist's messageof "30 Sep 2002 17:09:31 +0200")
• References: <8BD7226E07DDFF49AF5EF4030ACE0B7E07A9729D@r...> <1033136861.28149.393.camel@ibook> <87wup31pvj.fsf@n...><1033398572.2278.470.camel@ibook>
• User-agent: Gnus/5.090008 (Oort Gnus v0.08) Emacs/21.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

/ Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...> was heard to say:
|> But that schemaLocation thing should have been a PI anyway. It doesn't
|> belong as an attribute value in my instance document, darn it.
|
| You said it first! 

And I'll say it again, if you like.

| Eric (convinced that PIs should be de-de-facto-deprecated)

Uh huh.

<stage-direction>norm don's flame-retardant underwear</stage-direction>

The only significant technical objection I recall hearing against PIs
was that they didn't have globally unique names. But if we allowed the
PI target to be a QName...

<stage-direction>norm exits, stage left, quickly</stage-direction>

:-)

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

- -- 
Norman.Walsh@S...    | As charms are nonsense, nonsense is a
XML Standards Architect | charm.--Benjamin Franklin
Sun Microsystems, Inc.  | 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.7 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>

iD8DBQE9mHzxOyltUcwYWjsRAl3WAJ9zRRenovrqLh7qpEehakpnhjC9aACfVXWk
bu99jpUsMb+QZRCZG5wuuMc=
=7FcD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Rethinking namespaces, attribute remapping
    • From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>
  • Re: Rethinking namespaces, attribute remapping
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>

• References:
  • RE: Rethinking namespaces, attribute remapping (was Re: TAG on HLink)
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
  • RE: Rethinking namespaces, attribute remapping (wasRe: TAG on HLink)
    • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>
  • Re: Rethinking namespaces, attribute remapping
    • From: Norman Walsh <ndw@n...>
  • Re: Rethinking namespaces, attribute remapping
    • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>

• Prev by Date: Re: FW: Groves (was re: bunch of other stuff...)
• Next by Date: Re: limits of the generic
• Previous by thread: Re: Rethinking namespaces, attribute remapping
• Next by thread: Re: Rethinking namespaces, attribute remapping
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread