[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: parser models
Simon St.Laurent wrote: > I'm not sure that I accept that the difference between "editor" APIs and > "processing" APIs is that clean-cut in practice, though there's > certainly a cultural divide between developers who are creating markup > by marking up information (which I think you're categorizing as > "editor") and developers who expect information to come prepackaged in > neat little boxes. Well, there are definitely differences at the requirements level. People who build editors typically care about lexical fidelity; i.e. if I hand-write some XML with a CDATA section and the editor gets rid of it by escaping all the <'s and &'s, I'm going to get irritated, I probably had a good reason for the CDATA. Most people, of course, who aren't writing editors couldn't care less whether a < was encoded as < or < or in a CDATA section. -Tim
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|