[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: InnerXml is like printf (WAS: Underwhelmed)
Arjun Ray wrote, > My main concern has always been well-formedness. Validation is an > extra which I'm willing to forego in some circumstances, e.g. where > the coders do have familiarity with the vocabulary/ies. Cool. So take a closer look at my strawman. Using an XPath-derived string template syntax it ought to be possible to ensure well- formedness. InnerXml _is_ printf ... but that doesn't mean we couldn't have something analogous to printf which has its nice features (domain- specific little language) without the risk of non-well-formedness. And that's likely to be a win, even in comparison with, > hf.aHtml( > hf.aHead( > hf.aTitle( "Example 3" )).add( > hf.aLink( ) > .wRel( "stylesheet" ) > .wType( "text/css" ) > .wHref( new Uri( "/ss/style.css" )))).add( > hf.aBody( > hf.aP( "Hello World!" ))).accept( printer ) ; because we don't have to fight with Java's syntax. How about this mish-mash of XPath and s-exprs, Element e = new Element( "html/("+ "head/("+ "title/text(%0),"+ "link[@rel='stylesheet',@type='text/css',@uri=%1]),"+ "body/text(%2))", { "Example 3", "/ss/style.css", "Hello World" } ); (again assuming concise array literals). It's not clear to me that an HTML-specific library provides any great benfits in either safety or readability. And if it supports all of HTML 4.01 it's going to be large ... and obviously applicable only to HTML. Oh, and BTW: Hungarian notation is an abomination ;-) Cheers, Miles
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|