[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Rethinking namespaces, attribute remapping (was Re: [xml-d
Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote: > [...] We don't seem to be able > to have an efficient self-descriptive document and we > don't want to accept augmentation via external documents > (eg, DTDs, schemas). Is this an impasse that can be > met by compromises in certain applications, but only > narrowly and for a given application, but otherwise, > kicks off the same discussion for any new problem? Mu. > I am beginning to believe that attempting to work > with self-descriptive systems for any given problem > in every case is a non-starter. Exactly! > Well-formedness simply isn't enough for interoperability; > portability, yes, but not interoperability. To that I would add: XML namespaces don't solve the problem either. --Joe English jenglish@f...
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|