[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Shouldn't colon be reserved?
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 10:12:13AM -0700, Dare Obasanjo wrote: > I used to think everyone that uses XML today must be using namespaces > until I took a closer look around and noticed this was just how I used > XML. For example anyone using RSS 0.9x doesn't use namespaces (then > again some of them aren't aren't even really using XML but I digress) > similarly I've seen quite a few of widespread config and documentation > file formats that don't use namespaces either. We come from very different worlds, but I agree with you. Even in the free software community I come from, a lot of people simply don't bother with Namespaces, either they don't think they need to exchange document with other frameworks (config files), or for legacy reasons (DocBook), or because namespace don't make much easier to guess what application or libraries should be used to handle a specific XML file (file browser like Nautilus struggled with that) or simply they sometime make the job harder (simply adding xmlns="" on top of a document make all the XPath queries to search them 10 times more complex). Not that Namespaces in XML 1.0 didn't reach the goals it tried to attain, but it didn't make the job that easy and simple that it became ubiquitous. Still, I think it's a good spec :-) Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Network https://rhn.redhat.com/ veillard@r... | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|