[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Underwhelmed (WAS: XOM micro tutorial)

• To: "Elliotte Rusty Harold" <elharo@m...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: Underwhelmed (WAS: XOM micro tutorial)
• From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2002 09:40:57 -0700
• Thread-index: AcJhdtrddPWTOjKrRfqsa3e8zofo5QAFVf3C
• Thread-topic: Underwhelmed (WAS: XOM micro tutorial)

We shipped this functionality in the .NET framework and I use it all the time. Search for the string "InnerXml" in the text at http://www.kuro5hin.org/story/2002/9/14/19753/0994

	-----Original Message----- 
	From: Elliotte Rusty Harold [mailto:elharo@m...] 
	Sent: Sat 9/21/2002 6:36 AM 
	To: xml-dev@l... 
	Cc: 
	Subject: RE:  Underwhelmed (WAS:  XOM micro tutorial)
	
	

	At 9:13 PM -0700 9/20/02, Dare Obasanjo wrote:
	
	
	>  - Can't insert XML strings directly into the tree
	
	What do you mean by this? Are you saying
	element.appendChild("<p>Hello</p>") should attach a p child to
	element?
	
	I can't say this appeals to me. You might be able to come up with a
	logically consistent model where this makes sense, but I don't see
	it. Most of the people who want to do this appear to be confusing
	text and markup. Still, it would be an interesting approach for
	somebody to experiment with.
	

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Underwhelmed (WAS: XOM micro tutorial)
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Underwhelmed (WAS: XOM micro tutorial)
• Next by Date: Re: Underwhelmed (WAS: XOM micro tutorial)
• Previous by thread: RE: Underwhelmed (WAS: XOM micro tutorial)
• Next by thread: RE: Underwhelmed (WAS: XOM micro tutorial)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread