[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: The 11-pound solution to your XML problems
At 12/09/2002 18:05:13, Adam Turoff <ziggy@p...> wrote: # On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 05:22:35PM +0100, Alaric B. Snell wrote: # > I can't lose the feeling that something here is terribly, drastically, wrong # > here. Nobody ever made an XDR (eXternal Data Representation, not the other # > one) accelerator, an ASN.1 BER accelerator, or anything like that. # # Nobody ever made XDR or ASN.1 a household word, either. ASN.1 is in some *speicialist* quarters, or so I was reading. # > Why should # > you need special hardware for the minor issue of how you encode your # > information? I mean, if it's a complex encoding technique like data # > compression or encryption then sure, but XML isn't like that. # # You *need* special hardware to accelerate your XML processing # because that $1,000,000 StarCat you bought last year is burdened # by unused *generic* processing components. Everyone knows that # special purpose hardware can easily get an order of magnitude # performance increase over general purpose computers. It doesn't # matter what performance metric you use -- MIPS/pound, TB/liter or # GFLOPS/watt -- the special purpose hardware *always* offers better # performance. I suppose if they produced an XML dialect especiailly for climate/supernova modelling, maybe. # Plus, this XML Accelerator comes in a pretty green 1U enclosure. And it # has those cute *go-faster* stripes on the side! It looks like a lawnmower. Roger
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|