[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d
"Bullard, Claude L (Len)" scripsit: > The comment that use of RDF rules to interpret the XML content > results in loss of information and misinterpretation does. Well, document order information is lost, which can be quite a lot or nothing at all. As for misinterpretation, a better term would be interpretation that is inappropriate: if the strict alternation of resource/property/resource/property striping is not maintained, you may get junk assertions that mix up resources and properties. That's why I said that semanticless container elements should be avoided if RDF interpretation is desirable. -- John Cowan jcowan@r... www.reutershealth.com www.ccil.org/~cowan Consider the matter of Analytic Philosophy. Dennett and Bennett are well-known. Dennett rarely or never cites Bennett, so Bennett rarely or never cites Dennett. There is also one Dummett. By their works shall ye know them. However, just as no trinities have fourth persons (Zeppo Marx notwithstanding), Bummett is hardly known by his works. Indeed, Bummett does not exist. It is part of the function of this and other e-mail messages, therefore, to do what they can to create him.
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|