[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?


Re:  Re: Can XLink be fixed?

At 09:38 AM 8/17/2002 -0400, Simon St.Laurent wrote:
>I keep thinking about these divisions between what XLink does (define
>the existence of a relationship between resources) and what it doesn't
>do (provide much guidance on if/when/how to use it).

         Unlike some, I've always been a fan of XLink providing guidance on 
if, when and how to use it.....that said, this sort of processing behaviour 
should be defined in conjunction with other specifications. For example, 
when used with XHTML, this XLink constructs means one thing. When used with 
another specification, it means another. XLink needs to provide a means for 
associating independent behaviour with generic linking constructs.

         I'm not sure what the best way to do this would be. But I do 
believe that it would solve interoperability problems, and allow for the 
repurposing of dynamic content. For example, in a PDA environment, an 
extended link might do one thing, detailed in an appropriate 
specification...under the demesnes of the group setting the standards for 
PDA devices. In an ebook environment, the same link may do something 
different. And again, differently on the Web.

         This sounds like nasty interoperability, but if these groups would 
just get their butts in gear and -coordinate-, then interoperability 
problems could be solved with no loss to the needed flexibility for 
multiple media hyperlinking.

>I'm just not sure that there's much real benefit to using XLink.  On the

         And I agree. Although my involvement with XLink has been intimate, 
I am about as neutral on it as I am on anything else. Sure, it would 
gratify my ego to see people using XLink, but what I -really- want is one 
linking standard that everybody adopts. I don't care if it's XLinks, 
HyTime, or something cooked up in some Linux shop somewhere. I just want to 
see a standard adopted, and followed.

         This divisiveness among the groups who are supposed to be solving 
these problems is getting a little silly, as is all the theological 
hand-waving about the better spec, and the finger-pointing over who did 
what. Who cares? Give me a linking spec, and then use it, people!

--->Ben


PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
 

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.


Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.