[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer?
Tim Bray writes: > Anyhow, all this is history. XLink exists. Someone needs to decide > whether it is fatally flawed and should be deprecated, and if not, > whether it has a useful domain of application, and if so, whether W3C > specifications in that domain ought to be pressured to use it. I > suggest that is is a more productive line of discussion, and I > believe it's one that the TAG is going to take up in the > not-too-distant future. Or, alternatively, whether XLink is just one of many linking possibilities, much as W3C XML Schema is just one of many schema possibilities. Whether or not WXS is fatally flawed matters less when it's only one choice among many rather than a burden forced on people. W3C XML Linking, anyone? (Never mind that RDF and HTML are also W3C projects!) -- Simon St.Laurent Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets Errors, errors, all fall down! http://simonstl.com
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|