[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof
Paul Prescod writes: > Mike Champion wrote: > > I'm not sure what point I'm making here, other than maybe the various > > W3C WGs who took different approaches to the namespace problem weren't > > necessarily stupid, even if it looks like it in 20:20 hindsight :-) > > Namespaces should never have been scoped. That's a big part of what > drove the implementation complexity up to such a large degree. Writing most of MOE took me about three weeks. Adding namespace-scoping support took about an additional six weeks - and that was without having to deal with a committee. Fortunately, I was able to reuse most of that logic, suitably compressed, for the TAM parser, but while it's doable, it's not much fun. ------------- Simon St.Laurent - SSL is my TLA http://simonstl.com may be my URI http://monasticxml.org may be my ascetic URI urn:oid:1.3.6.1.4.1.6320 is another possibility altogether
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|