[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20)
> [mailto:larsga@p...] On Behalf Of Lars > Marius Garshol > > Would you mind explaining a bit more? I.e., do you have any > point to make beyond agreeing with me that RDF does not make > the distinction? I'm not agreeing with you, you've agreed with me: You said: > Hmmm. I think you can use URIs as identifiers without getting > into difficulties over whether you regard them as locators or > identifiers. RDF uses URIs in both ways, but the core RDF > model does not make a distinction between these two cases. I called you on that; RDF does not use them in both ways. Then you qualified: > The RDF Model Theory does not, that is true, but RDF > applications very much do. I echoed: The distinction doesn't exist in RDF. because RDF (as opposed to RDF apps and RDF syntax) is defined in the Model Theory; that is, when we speak of RDF, we're talking ultimately about the what's specified in the MT. As far as I can tell, you changed your mind mid thread. So how am I agreeing with you? regards, Bill de hÓra .. Propylon www.propylon.com
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|