[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Comparable considered necessary
I've been thinking about the kind of processing I do with XML. Nearly all of it involves matching against patterns. Some of it involves simple less-than/greater-than work with position. I think the largest concrete problem I have with URIs is their lack of a common mechanism for saying this equals that. I can live without ordering for names, so that's not a big deal, but the lack of clarity on things like: HTTP://MONASTICXML.COM vs. http://monasticxml.com vs. http://monasticXML.com is pretty much killing, even without issues of relative and absolute, query strings, etc. I don't see this getting better in the near future, as IRI issues and questions about escaping appear to be growing, not resolving. The lack of clarity - heck, the outright refusal to acknowledge the question - about how to get from an identifier to a resource or back again - is the nails in the coffin. It seems on the face of it to be a poor match for a system which depends at its foundations on identifying and recognizing labels. Maybe it's time to ask if "SGML for the Web" is getting poisoned by some folks' notion of the Web, even while it succeeds regularly in expanding (often questionably) in expanding many people's concrete experience and understanding of the Web. -- Simon St.Laurent Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets Errors, errors, all fall down! http://simonstl.com
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|