[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Reality check needed ....
Michael Kay scripsit: > I had assumed it was obvious to everyone in this community that names, > in general, should not carry implicit information about the objects they > refer to: or at any rate, that there are better ways of representing > this information than packing it into three bytes of the name. On that view, all objects should be given completely arbitrary names (OIDs, e.g.) with no connection to human understanding at all, and defenders of this position are not lacking. Me, I think it's just quirky that the 3rd St. Music School (in New York) is on 13th St. This argument is usually posed in terms of human-intelligible names lacking stability (Russia > Soviet Union > Russia, e.g.), but good counterexamples exist: the name "Roma" has referred to exactly the same city for the last 2756 years. -- One art / There is John Cowan <jcowan@r...> No less / No more http://www.reutershealth.com All things / To do http://www.ccil.org/~cowan With sparks / Galore -- Douglas Hofstadter
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|