[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the

• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the
• From: Richard Tobin <richard@c...>
• Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 19:00:32 +0100 (BST)
• Cc:
• In-reply-to: <B96EEABE.D863%hutch@x...>
• Organization: HCRC, University of Edinburgh

>I do not think the two elements <x:a m='1'/> and <x:a x:m='1'/> have
>the same attributes. You [Simon] seem to be saying that they do have
>the same attributes.

Simon knows they don't have the same attributes.  He thinks the
namespaces spec should have been different, so that they did have the
same attributes.  He's knows the spec isn't going to be changed, so he
thinks that vocabulary designers and applications should take the
responsibility of always giving them the same interpretation.

Is that right?

-- Richard

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • RE: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the
    • From: "Aaron Skonnard" <aarons@d...>

• References:
  • Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask thequestion)
    • From: Bob Hutchison <hutch@x...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask thequestion)
• Next by Date: RE: Trust
• Previous by thread: Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask thequestion)
• Next by thread: RE: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread