[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Byzantine schism
Hi, Hoops I forgot to include XSL-FO as some clever members has mentioned. Updated news about the Bizantine Schism: a) using Xlink or allowing its uses as defined in the specs: 2 (SVG, MathML) b) not using it: 3 (XHTML, XForm, SMIL, XSL-FO) Note: XSL_FO specifications (Oct 15 2001) where published after the xlink recommendation (June 27 2001). Question: Is there any integration or consistency checking process in W3C. If not, we may have the explanation. Even if a lot of brilliant people are active participant to the W3C WG, if wrong processes are used, wrong results occurs. I may have the best wood to make the best furniture and still get garbage if I use a mini mill manufacture to produce the them. If W3C has such consistency checking mechanism can I say WAKE UP! :-) Cheers Didier PH Martin
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|