[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: constructive (was RE: Markup perspective not cod
At 11:58 AM 8/3/2002 -0400, Mike Champion wrote: >[Sorry, but I love the parallel with A CANTICLE FOR LEIBOWITZ: >Uncontrolled technology leads to a Flame Deluge, followed by a >Great Simplification, with the Memorabilia of the markup age >preserved in the Abbey of St. Laurent in trust for a future >era that can appreciate it ... which will in turn pervert >that knowledge, leading to another uncontrolled >technology boom, leading to yet another Flame Deluge ... >Sic transit XML. <sickly grin> ] Sic transit gloria mundi. Fortunately (or not), I rarely write down my grocery lists. >So far, the only consensus of the smaller groups I've seen is that XML (in >all its monumental complexity) [expletive deleted]. Whenever they try to figure out what >to do about it, they immediately fragment into those who want to >recreate a "W3C" and do it over again, those who want to find a proper subset >of the XML specs and promote them, those who want to fight guerilla wars >without any formal organization or ties to XML, those who want to emigrate >back to SGML, etc. Yep. That's a natural process, messy as always. My suspicion is that sooner or later something will emerge and people will be ready for it. I expect it'll be a few years coming, and in the meantime it's best to simply speak frankly. The more people hear about problems and alternative solutions, the more likely I think they'll be to consider the problems themselves. That may make me Cassandra but I don't mind waiting a while for the sparks to catch. Simon St.Laurent "Every day in every way I'm getting better and better." - Emile Coue
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|