[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question
> Aaron Skonnard asks: > > I think I understand what you're saying. What I'm failing to see is > > how this simplifies anything from the coder's perspective if it > > doesn't impact the way attributes are reflected in the APIs (as Tim > > Bray noted). Developers still have to know your rule when writing the > > code. How would it be any less confusing than it is now? ... Simon: > Also, for future reference, monasticxml.org isn't particularly > interested in the "coder's perspective". It's squarely and very > deliberately focused on markup works, not what's easiest for > programmers from other perspectives. But since you can have to implement your rule at the application level (as you admitted), doesn't that imply code? -aaron http://staff.develop.com/aarons
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|