[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d

• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d
• From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
• Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2002 20:17:38 -0600
• In-reply-to: Message from "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...> of "Tue, 20 Aug 2002 12:34:56 EDT." <r01050300-1015-C32EC535B45A11D69F470003937A08C2@[192.168.124.21]>
• Sender: uche.ogbuji@f...

> John Cowan writes:
> > 3) Eschew mixed content.
> 
> Is this an absolute must for such RDF interpretation?
> 
> It really seems to highlight that RDF and XML are different planets.

RDF is for metadata.  XML has strong use in content.  Different uses is not 
the same thing as different planets.  You use Java and you also use XML.  By 
this odd analogy, I wonder how you manage to do both, given that 
interplanetary travel is very expensive yet.


-- 
Uche Ogbuji                                    Fourthought, Inc.
http://uche.ogbuji.net    http://4Suite.org    http://fourthought.com
Track chair, XML/Web Services One Boston: http://www.xmlconference.com/
Basic XML and RDF techniques for knowledge management, Part 7 - http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/xml/library/x-think12.html
Keeping pace with James Clark - http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/xml/library/x-jclark.html
Python and XML development using 4Suite, Part 3: 4RDF - http://www-105.ibm.com/developerworks/education.nsf/xml-onlinecourse-bytitle/8A1EA5A2CF4621C386256BBB006F4CEC

• References:
  • Re: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: patterns vs. identifiers
• Next by Date: Re: Architectural Forms (was Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death)
• Previous by thread: Re: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d
• Next by thread: Re: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d ev] patterns vs. identifiers)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread