[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Comparable considered necessary
Err.. right. I fail to see the distinction. I have to get the cat's attention one way or another or accept the name on face value. It comes down to the will to dererference, did the cat leave Thing One or Thing Two to explain things, and do I accept the interchangeability of Thing One and Thing Two as authorized representatives. The name inside the name documents the authority. I have to accept it as being asserted. I don't have to accept what it asserts. The URI agreement is the systemic agreement of the former. The latter is accepted or negotiated. len -----Original Message----- From: John Cowan [mailto:jcowan@r...] "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" scripsit: > There is a name of a cat to ask inside. The name is > meaningless but it is used by lots of servers and that > makes it moreorless a reliable way to get the cat's > attention. No, no. Inside a *namespace* name is a name of the source of authority for that name.
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|