[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: linking, 80/20
"Simon St.Laurent" wrote: > >... > > That said, I think something like Erik Wilde's proposal of looking at > XLink as an abstraction and permitting the mapping of components from > other vocabularies into that abstraction works well. > > Link harvesters shouldn't need a whole lot of training to figure out > that "href==(xlink:href xlink:type='simple') in XHTML." This is a > pretty easy transformation. That solution is fine for a vocabulary as widely deployed as XHTML. But how do I communicate that Docbook's linking elements are "really" XLinks in disguise? Or TEI? Or ... I think that there needs to be a way to make that declaration out of line. Perhaps in something like CSS. Perhaps in the schema. Perhaps in something new altogether. -- "When I walk on the floor for the final execution, I'll wear a denim suit. I'll walk in there like Willie Nelson, John Wayne, Will Smith -- Men in Black -- James Brown. Maybe do a Michael Jackson moonwalk." Congressman James Traficant.
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|