[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: XML Core WG needs input on xml:lang=""

• To: michael.h.kay@n...
• Subject: Re: XML Core WG needs input on xml:lang=""
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2002 17:12:58 -0400 (EDT)
• Cc: Eric.Paschoalick@g... ('Eric Paschoalick Chaves'), jcowan@r... ('John Cowan'), xml-dev@l..., xml-editor@w...
• In-reply-to: <002101c23b25$4704a270$6401a8c0@pcukmka> from "Michael Kay" at Aug 03, 2002 08:38:00 PM

Michael Kay scripsit:

> I believe the I18N folks have already decreed that we are not allowed to
> use languages that have not been officially endorsed by whoever sets
> themselves up to decide these things.

If you have a language for which there is no RFC 3066 tag, you just
go to ietf-languages@a... and propose it according to the
form appearing in RFC 3066.  Nothing to it.  If there's no problem
with the registration, the language tag becomes legitimate and is sent
to IANA to register, and that's that.

No cabals here.

-- 
John Cowan        http://www.ccil.org/~cowan          jcowan@r...
Please leave your values        |       Check your assumptions.  In fact,
   at the front desk.           |          check your assumptions at the door.
     --sign in Paris hotel      |            --Miles Vorkosigan

• References:
  • RE: XML Core WG needs input on xml:lang=""
    • From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question)
• Next by Date: RE: relying on ordering of sibling XML elements
• Previous by thread: RE: XML Core WG needs input on xml:lang=""
• Next by thread: Truncation parsing &lt;
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread