[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: constructive (was RE: Markup perspective not cod
Hi Jimmy, Jimmy Said: Well, I think there are already two groups of xml users appearing: 1) The group that uses xml for machine processing. Within this group are factions working on versions of "diet xml": SML, YAML and so on... 2) The group that uses xml for eventual human interaction. Didier replies: Can you expend on item (2). Do you mean xml document used as rendering definition/instruction (in that case we reduce (2) into (1) ) or do you mean the fact that xml documents can be read by human beings and documents' readability then becomes the foreground preoccupation. Jimmy said: There are already several xml applications that cater to both groups. MathML contains both presentation and semantic markup for machine processing and human reading (although OpenMath is better at describing the semantic parts). Didier replies: I would personally classify MathML as a rendering language. However I do not know OpenMath and if I want to sleep less crazy tonight, do you have a link to a good introduction of OpenMath. Thanks in advance to help me become less stupid. Cheers Didier PH Martin
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|