[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Schema Sanity Check
Dare Obasanjo wrote: > Looking at the complex type definition for the ur-type[0] we note > that its {content type} has a particle whose {term} is a sequence > whose {particles} contains a single {term} which is wildcard with > namespace constraint set to any. > > In short, the content of a complex type of type xs:anyType is > anything from any namespace. However, the default value of > processContents[1] for a wildcard is strict meaning that a schema > must be provided for each of the elements [or attributes] that > appear in the content model. There's probably going to be an erratum on this, to explicitly say that the processContents of the xs:any and xs:anyAttribute wildcards in the xs:anyType complex type are either *lax* or *skip*. See: http://www.w3.org/2001/05/xmlschema-rec-comments#pfianyTypeLax Cheers, Jeni --- Jeni Tennison http://www.jenitennison.com/
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|