[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] XLink and XML specs (was Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death ofXLink
8/13/2002 1:34:19 PM, Tim Bray <tbray@t...> wrote: >Anyhow, all this is history. XLink exists. Someone needs to decide >whether it is fatally flawed and should be deprecated, and if not, >whether it has a useful domain of application, and if so, whether W3C >specifications in that domain ought to be pressured to use it. I >suggest that is is a more productive line of discussion, and I believe >it's one that the TAG is going to take up in the not-too-distant future. OK, I'll bite: IMHO the TAG should not pressure WGs to accept any technology that is not well-proven to be fully implementable, useful and interoperable in real software systems. I suspect the discussion of XLink would be very short if those criteria were accepted :~)
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|