[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: assigning semantics to XML, Re: Re: URIs, concre

• To: XML DEV <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: assigning semantics to XML, Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question)
• From: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@f...>
• Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2002 16:09:15 -0400
• Organization: Fiduciary Automation
• References: <20020729195028.LZBA24567.rwcrmhc51.attbi.com@rwcrwbc70>

jborden@a... wrote:

> This does not mean that one is _required_ to assign _a different_ interpretation to each of the above cases, rather it means that one _is not required_ to assign _the same_ interpretation to each of the above cases. The distinction is important.

I agree with you. To return to the narrower question with which this began, is it not John and Tim who are arguing, in effect, that we must assign a different interpretation in the processing of a attribute that is in no namespace than we might
assign in processing the same attribute as if it were in the namespace of its element?

Respectfully,

Walter Perry

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: assigning semantics to XML, Re: Re: URIs,
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
  • Re: assigning semantics to XML, Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question)
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>

• References:
  • assigning semantics to XML, Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question)
    • From: jborden@a...

• Prev by Date: Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question)
• Next by Date: Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question)
• Previous by thread: assigning semantics to XML, Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question)
• Next by thread: Re: assigning semantics to XML, Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread