[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: URIs harmful
John Cowan wrote: > Jonathan Borden scripsit: > > > I don't mean to imply that you as a person are not a "major player" but > > since you are using your microsoft.com email, I will assume that you are > > speaking in your capacity as an employee of Microsoft. > > That is *never* a wise thing to do for an employee of *anybody* at all. > General disclaimer: unless otherwise marked in the email, *nothing* > I say represents the opinion of Reuters Health even presuming that it > has one, or Reuters as a whole, or anybody else but me. > and Joshua Allen added: >Yep, same here. Opinions about "the semantic web" within Microsoft are > quite diverse; my perspective is nowhere near representative. Fair enough. I want to reinterate that I don't mean to attack Joshua personally in the least. I respect his opinions, they are (mostly :-) well thought out. The exchange at the end of last week got a bit more heated than was indicated -- we are just having _yet another_ argument about URIs after all, it's not like this has any real meaning -- but it seems that arguing about URIs does this to the best of us... I think getting URIs straight is actually one of the more important questions we can discuss about the Web in general so I am willing to spend more than a few cycles trying to get it right. I also think that this discussion spilled over from another discussion on www-tag, and may have come as if from out of the blue to xml-dev folks so following this I will send another message with my views on URIs and nameing -- and if you are entirely too tired of this conversation feel free to kill my next message... Jonathan
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|