[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: URIs harmful
> stacked up against that (third) view. In any case you are going to have to > articulate your view because I see no "FIRE". I hope you are not once again confusing your local perspective with the global one. I think that many people see the problem exactly as I have stated it. I think that many people have understood the many clear examples I've put forth of why it's crass to overload http: identifiers like this. If *you* don't, it could mean that you aren't listening carefully enough, or are incapable of seeing reason. It really doesn't matter what it means, though, since you aren't the person I have to convince. > actual fire. In any case no major "Semantic Web" player advocates using Gee, what would it take for me to become a big-time "semantic web playa"? Silly I'd have thought that one could know who the players are by their fruits. But I don't see any fruits other then a few locally-contextual proofs-of-concept, and the people who think HTTP extends to "infinity and beyond". When it's so hard to figure out who the true players are, and when players in any case are usually egotistical and stubborn, I personally don't regard appeals to the vested authority of players as a valid way to make decisions.
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|