[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Please keep Relax NG simple (RE: RELAX NG and type derivat
I think the acid tests for features of RELAX NG have been soundness and fitness, which also includes implementability. In my opinion, I think there is little danger of RELAX NG getting ahead of itself, and I don't see this as a frailty. To me, RELAX NG takes sort of a Winston Churchill approach rather than a Neville Chamberlain approach, that is, dogged determination to do the right thing, even against great odds, instead of hurried attempts at "peace for our time" or appeasement. (I do not use Mr. Chamberlain as an allusion to XML Schema but to the practice of "marketing at all costs," whatever the setting.) Mike Eric van der Vlist wrote: > Although I agree that, technically, you're 100% right, I find very > frightening any attempt to align, feature by feature, Relax NG on W3C > XML Schema. >
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|