[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question)

• To: wperry@f... (W. E. Perry)
• Subject: Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question)
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2002 15:02:38 -0400 (EDT)
• Cc: xml-dev@l... (XML DEV)
• In-reply-to: <3D458EDF.6F5BEC46@f...> from "W. E. Perry" at Jul 29, 2002 02:52:15 PM

W. E. Perry scripsit:

> Yes, I understand that 'under the Namespaces Rec' that is what it means. My
> question, or musing, was what within the scope of element foo or baz:foo (as
> presumably demonstrable in the semantics elaborated from some processing of that
> element) is the difference in the weight of bar as modifier of foo. 

Well, to me it suggests that the meaning of bar is relative to the meaning
of foo, but the meaning of baz:foo is not necessarily.  The xml:lang is
a good example (means the same thing everywhere) and likewise with html:class.

-- 
There is / One art                      John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
No more / No less                       http://www.reutershealth.com
To do / All things                      http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
With art- / Lessness                     -- Piet Hein

• References:
  • Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question)
    • From: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@f...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question)
• Next by Date: RE: HTTP is
• Previous by thread: Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question)
• Next by thread: Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread