[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question)
Tim Bray writes: > And yes, it is obvious that an attribute can draw the bulk of its > semantic import from the namespace it's in, rather than the context of > the containing element. Consider > > <anyOldElementAtAllIDontCareWhich xml:lang="fr">Bonjour! ... Yes, and you've completely missed my point yet again. I'm not arguing that prefixed attributes should be in the namespace of the element containing them. I'm arguing that _unprefixed_ attributes should be treated as if they had the same namespace as the element containing them. > There's a technical term for Simon's argument in this case: "wrong". There's a technical term for the Namespaces in XML Recommendation, but I'm afraid it's unprintable. I stand by my claim. I'd like to propose that it's past time to fix these issues instead of leaving them to fester. -- Simon St.Laurent Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets Errors, errors, all fall down! http://simonstl.com
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|