[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: RE: HTTP is
7/29/2002 2:06:31 PM, jborden@a... wrote: > >In any case suppose we agree with TimBL i.e. http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/HTTP-URI.html ... it seems to push the rathole onto what a fragment identifier identifies ... sigh. The more so- called solutions to these issues I've seen, the more questions are raised. > Speaking of ratholes, doesn't TimBL's position imply that namespace names should URI *references* -- the URI itself would point to a document, and some #fragment thingie would refer to the abstract namespace that the document discusses? Forgive me if I misinterpret this ... anyway, that piece by TimBL seems like required reading for anyone who cares about this issue. I for one I do find notion that URIs refer to nice concrete bundles of bits on the Internet rather comforting!
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|