[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: question: can anyone give me a reason why OWL shouldhave d
[bryan] > > So I was looking over Owl > http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-webont-req-20020708/ > > When I found yet another case of interlock with WXSDL(under > section-use-cases; R15. Complex data types). The motivations given were > compatibility with other standards, and ease of use. > > Anyone excited about this and think it's a good idea? > Anyone over-excited by this and think it's the worst idea since > one-dimensional bread? > I got a gut reaction that immediately spun me into the second camp, am > looking to climb out and learn to smile, smile again. > I got an immediate reation or two myself. First of all, I can see that providing for structured values (as the object of statements) might be quite useful. On the other hand, this is probably equivalent to tuples of higher arity than RDF uses. So how would it be compatoble iwth RDF? Second, even granted the above, XML Schema was not designed for knowledge representation. So how can you expect its structures to be good for that purpose? And if they are not, why require compatibility? So it may be OK, but I'm skeptical. Cheers, Tom P
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|