[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: URIs harmful
[Bill de hÓra] If axiom 1 was the case: 1: RDF would not need a Model Theory. We'd have no requirement for assigning interpretations to URI vocabularies. But, oddly enough that is not the case; we do have the requirement for a denotational semantics for RDF and a number of people have spent a lot time on it. [Tom P] Yes, but the interpretations apply to sets of RDF triples, not to the URIs used to identify RDF resources. [Bill] 2: we could throw away 2a as redundant. Note: RDF MT requires this one. The axioms are desirable, but not observable. And perhaps 2a is not desirable; this would suggest the languages of the semantic web can't evolve and will continually need to be replaced. [Tom P] This depends on what "sameness" means, of course - is that an NP-hard question? Cheers, Tom P
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|