[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9

• To: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@r...>
• Subject: Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
• From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
• Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 09:30:42 -0600
• Cc: Michael Fuller <msf@m...>, xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: Message from Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@r...> of "Fri, 14 Jun 2002 00:05:40 PDT." <3D0995C4.2EF20A6C@r...>
• Sender: uche.ogbuji@f...

> Michael Fuller wrote:
> 
> > Note that this implies that DTDs that allow the use of use xml:lang [etc.]
> > must explicitly declare:
> >     <!NAMESPACE xml "http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace">
> > 
> > In fact, would it also be the case that *every* DTD that use
> > namespaces at all must explicitly declare**:
> >     <!NAMESPACE xmlns "http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace">
> 
> These could also be bound by definition, which is what the namespaces
> spec does. (Actually, unless there's an errata I've missed, only xml is
> bound. xmlns is by definition not bound to anything.)

Yep.  There's an erratum you missed.

http://www.w3.org/XML/xml-names-19990114-errata#NE05


-- 
Uche Ogbuji                                    Fourthought, Inc.
http://uche.ogbuji.net    http://4Suite.org    http://fourthought.com
Track chair, XML/Web Services One (San Jose, Boston): http://www.xmlconference.com/
DAML Reference - http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2002/05/01/damlref.html
The Languages of the Semantic Web - http://www.newarchitectmag.com/documents/s=2453/new1020218556549/index.html
XML, The Model Driven Architecture, and RDF @ XML Europe - http://www.xmleurope.com/2002/kttrack.asp#themodel

• References:
  • Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
    • From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@r...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Tommorrow, June 15th, Deadline for Call for Presentation for XML
• Next by Date: Re: Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: Re: Re: DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation
• Previous by thread: Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
• Next by thread: Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread