[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box

• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
• From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
• Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2002 12:40:04 -0400
• In-reply-to: <4.2.0.58.20020611111645.0374ef10@p...>

6/11/2002 11:20:55 AM, "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...> wrote:

>At 11:06 AM 6/11/2002 -0400, Mike Champion wrote:
>
>
>I'm a text-editor kind of guy who writes SAX filters.  That solves a lot 
>for me. 

So, I take it your approach is to have the application use pattern-matching to 
extract the information within an element/attribute value into the form
you wish to process it?  For example  let the author type the date in any convenient format, then
use something like the Javascript Date.parse() method (sorry, I'm a DOM/Javascript weenie
by default ...I guess you would use regular  fragmentations and SAX) to 
make it useful by the application???

Hmm, I guess that makes sense a an option; rather than have the GUI 
normalize it, or some post-processor normalize it (making it vulnerable
to being broken by somebody "fixing" the XML with Notepad), just
do the "normalization" in the application. I'm personally not crazy about
it (since I tend to use XPath and/or XSLT to locate parts of a document
or a collection of docs to process, and XPath doesnt' know about the private
understanding between author and app writer on what the acceptable formats
for a date might be).

Still, I'm sure we agree on the fundamental point: there is a lot of territory
between helplessly dealing with <date>June 11, 2002</date> as 
a string that requires human intervention to process, and drinking the Schema koolaid
in order to automatically bind it to a Date object.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• References:
  • Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
• Next by Date: Re: Data binding as type definition
• Previous by thread: Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
• Next by thread: Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread