[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easierto aut
Paul Prescod wrote: > If the instances are generated under your control by a machine, then by > definition they won't use the short-tag feature if your regexps don't > support it. The complexity argument also does not wash: entities and > CDATA sections easily add the most complexity to XML of any feature. Machine-generated XML usually doesn't do entities or CDATA. It does do <someTag> ..stuff.. ..stuff.. </someTag> and perl is just the ticket. > The one thing that strikes a cord with me is the phrase "at this point". > It's too late to make changes to XML. Indeed. -Tim
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|