[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: Re: Re: DSDL: u
David Carlisle wrote: > > > I note that the recommendation specifies a notion which is untenable. > > ... > > I do take issue with claims that this set does not exist. > > I suspect that the reason for not calling it a namespace is that you are > supposed to think of it as multiple sets which are not distinguished in > the syntax. This conflates the behaviour of sets of names with that of the mechanisms which bind names to other things, like element and attribute declarations. > > That is, if you have two documents that contain the element > {http://www.w3.org/1998/math/MathML}math then they are references to the > same element in the same set (the mathml namespace) > > However if you have two documents referencing {}math then arguably they > are not intended to be the same element, It may be that they are in > different sets of elements but that the XML namespace syntax does not > distinguish that (maybe the application does using other info, eg the doctype). > ...
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|